The Change Process of Pathogenic Beliefs in Psychotherapy Effect to Depression: Case study of Mobility Impaired Person and Borderline Personality Disorder

Authors

  • adam neelapaijit Ratchasuda College Mahidol University

Keywords:

pathogenic beliefs, psychoherapy, mobility impaired person, borderline personality disorder

Abstract

This research aimed to study changing process of pathogenic beliefs in psychotherapy effect to depression: case study of mobility impaired person and borderline personality from the transcript of patient in psychotherapy treatment and PBs test, PHQ-9 test. Purposive sampling include one mobility impaired person, depression and borderline personality disorder having psychotherapy treatment at least 20 times in 1.30 hours.

The result was shown that the individual experience lead to the beliefs and create the core issue which is the mental structure growing up from the past experience. The psychotherapy treatment shall be the process to change the beliefs in core issue and to be platform to build the appropriate healthy capability by Accessing to open mind including feelings, beliefs, motivation, values and memory as the first step of Psychotherapy process.  The next is the Healing Response, the unconscious mind/culture shall be revealed and response to the process in the various pattern.  The Experimenting step, the therapist shall have more understanding and knowledge to their adaptation.  The last step is the Inner Healing that is the encourage method to make therapist in confidence and process their good life. The result was shown that patient’s score had a lower rate of depression.

Author Biography

adam neelapaijit, Ratchasuda College Mahidol University

Rehabilitation for Persons with Disabilities Department

References

ณหทัย วงศ์ปการันย์, ทินกร วงศ์ปการันย์. บุคลิกภาพแปรปรวน: การประเมินและการรักษา.

เชียงใหม่: กลางเวียงการพิมพ์; 2555.

ทินกร วงศ์ปการันย์. จิตบำบัด: ทฤษฎีและเทคนิค. พิมพ์ครั้งที่3. เชียงใหม่: กลางเวียงการพิมพ์; 2558.

Taylor PJ, Rietzschel J, Danquah A, Berry K. The role of attachment style, attachment to

therapist, and working alliance in response to psychological therapy. Psychol Psychother 2015;

(3):240-53.

Siegel DF, Hilsenroth MJ. Process and technique factors associated with patient ratings of

session safety during psychodynamic psychotherapy. Am J Psychother 2013;67(3):257-76.

Brooks-Harris JE. Integrative multitheoretical psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin; 2007

Rappoport A. Freeing oneself from pathogenic adaptations: a contribution to control-mastery

theory. Psychotherapy Bulletin 1996;31(4):27-33.

Hersoug AG, Høglend P, Havik OE, Monsen JT. Development of working alliance over the course

of psychotherapy. Psychol Psychother 2010;83:145-59.

Allen JG, Fonagy P, Bateman AW. Mentalizing in clinical practice. Washinton DC: American

psychiatric publishing; 2008.

Sammet I, Leichsenring F, Schauenburg H, Andreas S. Self-ratings of pathogenic beliefs: A study based

on the psychodynamic control-mastery theory. Psychotherapy Research 2007;17(4):494-503.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30 — Updated on 2026-02-11

Versions