DEVELOPING A MODEL OF CARE FOR THE MULTIPLE TRAUMA HYPOVOLEMIC SHOCK PATIENTS IN SAWANPRACHARAK HOSPITAL

Authors

  • สุพัตรา อยู่สุข โรงพยาบาลสวรรค์ประชารักษ์

Keywords:

The multiple trauma patient care model, Hypovolemic shock, Multiple trauma patients

Abstract

This research aimed to develop the model of care for the Hypovolemic shock multiple trauma patients in Sawanpracharak Hospital. The study was implemented between January, 2016 to August, 2016. There were three phases of research included: 1) analyzing the context and situation of multiple trauma care. 2) developing the model of the Hypovolemic shock multiple trauma patients care, and 3) evaluating the effectiveness of model. The target subjects were 20 nurses working in the trauma wards who were continuously implemented in the for the Hypovolemic shock multiple trauma patient care model, 130 Hypovolemic shock class II to class III in multiple trauma patients before receiving the model, and 65 multiple trauma patients during before receiving. The instruments used for collecting data were: 1) the Hypovolemic shock multiple trauma patient care model, 2) the protocol of caring for the Hypovolemic shock multiple trauma patient care model, and 3) the data record outcome of taking care of Hypovolemic shock multiple trauma patients. Data were analyzed using the descriptive statistic independent t-test, and exact probability test.

The findings revealed that the components influenced the model of the Hypovolemic shock multiple trauma patients care included: 1) multidisciplinary team, 2) operational plans, 3) participate of patients and families, 4) competency for nurses working in the trauma, 5) multiple trauma patient care processes, and 6) knowledge management. The model effectiveness testing showed the statistically significant differences between prior and during receiving the care for the Hypovolemic shock multiple trauma patients care model as follow: Process indicators showed The duration of the accident to the traumatic ward (78.4 and 63.3, p=0.005), Accident and Emergency Room time to physician diagnosed with Hypovolemic shock (32.4 and 25.4, p=0.001). Nursing Indicators showed The duration of the physician’s report when the patient admit ward (10.5 and 3.98, p=<0.001) and Patient indicators showed Hypovolemic shock class II to class III within 24 hours, and 72 hours (42, 31 and 6, 4, p=<0.001, 0.003) Hypoxia within 24 hours, and 72 hours (27, 19 and 2, 2, p=0.001, 0.014). However, the health status of patients within 72 hours showed moderate disability (66.2 and 69.2 (p=0.407) of the two groups were no statistically significant differences.

Results that the model of care for the Hypovolemic shock multiple trauma patients can reduce severity Hypovolemic shock from level II goes to level III and deceased Hypoxia in the hospital. And to achieve consistently good results, Should be studied to monitor the recovery phase before discharge. Both in the hospital and follow-up visits to the hospital in the network.

References

ศูนย์ข้อมูลอุบัติเหตุ. ข้อมูลอุบัติเหตุ 2549-2558. เข้าถึงได้: URL:http://service.nso.go.th/nso/web/statseries/statseries.

Newberry L. Emergency nursing principle and practice. Philadephia: Mosby National Institute for Clinical Excellence 2001. Avaiilable January 7, 2017, form URL: http://www. nice.org.uk.

Nicola C, Sally H, Carolyn D, Chris H, Karim B, Simon S. The acute management of trauma hemorrhage: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Critical Care 2011; 15-92.

Chad MC, Carla CB, Mendy KS, Jonathan DM, Elizabeth C, Michael M. Utility of the Shock Index in Predicting Mortality in Traumatically Injured Patients. The Journal of TRAUMA Injury, Infection, and Critical Care 2009; 67: 1426-1430.

Kevin FM, Jose DC, Juan SC, Luis RN, Gustavo P. Shock index as a mortality predictor in patients with Acutepolytrauma.Journal of Acute Disease 2015; 4: 202–204.

Schumacher KL, Meleis AI. Transitions: A central concept in nursing. Journal of Nursing Scholarship1994; 26:119-127.

Meleis AI, Sawyer LM, Im E, Messias DK, Schumacher K.Experiencing transitions: An emerging middle-rangetheory. Advance Nursing Science 2000; 23:12-28.

โรงพยาบาลสวรรค์ประชารักษ์. สรุปผลงานประจำปี 2558. นครสวรรค์: โรงพยาบาลสวรรค์ประชารักษ์; 2558.

Alexandar RH, & Proctor HJ. ATLS Advance Trauma Life Support: Student manual. The American College of Surgeons: Chicago 1993.

Newberry L. Emergency Nursing Principle and Practice. Philadephia: Mosby 2003.

ชไมพันธุ์ สันติกาญจน์ และคนอื่นๆ. รายงานการเฝ้าระวังการบาดเจ็บในประเทศไทย. กรุงเทพฯ: 2538, 21:3, 144-155.

กฤษดา แสวงดี, ชฎาภรณ์ เปรมปรามอมร, สารา วงษ์เจริญ, ส่งศรี กิตติรักษ์ตระกูล, จินนะรัตน์ ศรีภัทรภิญโญ และอัมภา ศรารัชต์. มาตรฐานบริการพยาบาลศูนย์ตติยภูมิเฉพาะทาง “ศูนย์อุบัติเหตุ” กรุงเทพฯ: บริษัทสามเจริญพาณิชย์; 2548.

Mutschler M, Paffrath T, Wolfl C, Probst C, Nienaber U, Schipper B, et al. The ATLS classification of hypovolaemic shock: A well established teaching tool on the edge. Injury, Int, J. Care Injured 2014; 45: S35-S38.

Glenn S, Michael P, Michael S, editors. Management of Hypovolaemic Shock in the Trauma Patient.Institute of Trauma and Injury Management (online) 2007 (cited 2007 Jan); 1:(50). Avaiilable from: URL: http://www.health.nsw.gov.au.

กัญญารัตน์ ผึ่งบรรหาร, ฐิติ ภมรศิปะธรรม และลัดดา มีจันทร์. การพัฒนารูปแบบการดูแลผู้ป่วยบาดเจ็บหลายระบบในภาะวิกฤต โรงพยาบาลอุตรดิถ์, สารสารวิทยาลัยพยาบาลบรมราชชนนี อุตรดิตถ์ 2557; 1: 24-37.

ประณีต ส่งวัฒนา. กระบวนการดูแลผู้บาดเจ็บอย่าง. วารสารมหาวิทยาลัยนราธิวาส. 2555; 2: 16-28.

Downloads

Published

2019-05-10

How to Cite

อยู่สุข ส. (2019). DEVELOPING A MODEL OF CARE FOR THE MULTIPLE TRAUMA HYPOVOLEMIC SHOCK PATIENTS IN SAWANPRACHARAK HOSPITAL . Journal of Department of Health Service Support-วารสารวิชาการกรมสนับสนุนบริการสุขภาพ, 13(2), 39–49. Retrieved from https://thaidj.org/index.php/jdhss/article/view/6400

Issue

Section

Research Articles