Factors Influencing Bullying Perpetration among Lower Secondary School Students in Pathum Thani Province

Authors

  • Kulnaree Hanpatchaiyakul คณะพยาบาลศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยชินวัตร
  • chutima Jirathikrengkrai Faculty of Nursing, Shinawatra University
  • Chiraporn Kesornsuwan คณะพยาบาลศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยชินวัตร

Keywords:

bullying, violence, students, self-esteem

Abstract

Bullying among adolescents represents a significant public health challenge, with Thailand exhibiting a high prevalence rate of 26.9%. This descriptive research aimed to examine the factors influencing bullying perpetration behaviors among lower secondary school students in Pathum Thani Province. The sample consisted of 220 students from grades 7–9, selected through simple random sampling. Data collection instruments included an influence of violence questionnaire, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and a bullying behavior questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression.

The results revealed that the most prevalent form of bullying was verbal bullying (60.5%), followed by physical bullying (48.6%) and social bullying (43.2%). Binary logistic regression analysis indicated that negative peer influence was the most significant predictor, increasing the likelihood of cyberbullying by 10.627 times and physical bullying by 7.097 times. Additionally, family violence influence increased the likelihood of social bullying by 2.658 times, while social media violence influence increased verbal bullying by 3.325 times. High self-esteem was identified as a crucial protective factor, significantly reducing the likelihood of prejudice-based bullying by 57.1%. In conclusion, bullying perpetration among lower secondary school students stems from complex interactions between individual psychological characteristics and social contexts. Addressing school bullying requires comprehensive, multi-level proactive interventions, including shifting peer norms, strengthening family functioning, and enhancing individual psychological resilience

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

United Nations Children’s Fund. Violent deaths 2024 [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2026 Feb 5]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-protection/violence/violent-deaths/

World Health Organization. Youth violence [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2026 Feb 5]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/youth-violence

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Behind the numbers: ending school violence and bullying. Paris: UNESCO; 2019.

Yu S, Zhao X. The negative impact of bullying victimization on academic literacy and social integration: evidence from 51 countries in PISA. Soc Sci Humanit Open 2021;4(1):100151.

Pengpid S, Peltzer K. Bullying and its associated factors among school-aged adolescents in Thailand. Scientific World Journal 2013;2013:254083.

Smith L, López Sánchez GF, Haro JM, Alghamdi AA, Pizzol D, Tully MA, et al. Temporal trends in bullying victimization among adolescents aged 12–15 years from 29 countries: a global perspective. J Adolesc Health 2023;73(3):582–90.

Aunampai A, Widyastari D, Chuanwan S, Katewongsa P. Association of bullying on happiness at school: evidence from Thailand’s national school-based survey. Int J Adolesc Youth 2022;27:72–84.

Olweus D. Bullying at school: what we know and what we can do. Malden: Blackwell Publishing; 1993.

Olweus D. Bullying at school: basic facts and effects of a school-based intervention program. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1994;35(7):1171–90.

Olweus D, Breivik K. Plight of victims of school bullying: the opposite of well-being. In: Ben-Arieh A, Casas F, Frønes I, Korbin JE, editors. Handbook of child well-being: theories, methods and policies in global perspective. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. p. 2593–616.

Armitage R. Bullying in children: impact on child health. BMJ Paediatr Open 2021;5:e000939.

Hensums M, Brummelman E, Larsen H, van den Bos W, Overbeek G. Social goals and gains of adolescent bullying and aggression: a meta-analysis. Dev Rev 2023; 68:101073.

Jormanainen E, Fröjd S, Marttunen M, Kaltiala R. Is pubertal timing associated with involvement in bullying in middle adolescence? Health Psychol Behav Med 2014; 2:1–12.

Jagasia E, Bloom I, Nelson KE, Campbell J. Early adolescent development in the face of violence: a systematic review. Child Abuse Negl 2024;151:106751.

Fredrick SS, Demaray MK. Peer victimization and suicidal ideation: the role of gender and depression in a school-based sample. J Sch Psychol 2018;67:1–15.

Ye Z, Wu D, He X, Ma Q, Peng J, Mao G, et al. Meta-analysis of the relationship between bullying and depressive symptoms in children and adolescents. BMC Psychiatry 2023;23(1):215.

López-Castro L, Smith PK, Robinson S, Görzig A. Age differences in bullying victimisation and perpetration: evidence from cross-cultural surveys. Aggress Violent Behav 2023;73:101888.

Oberle E, Ji XR, Molyneux TM. Pathways from prosocial behaviour to emotional health and academic achievement in early adolescence. J Early Adolesc 2023;43(5): 632–53.

Zych I, Farrington DP, Ttofi MM. Protective factors against bullying and cyberbullying: a systematic review of meta-analyses. Aggress Violent Behav 2019;45:419.

Song S, Xie R, Tan D, Yuan Z, Li W, Ding W. Will violence cycle? The reciprocal relationship between children’s bullying involvement and interparental conflict. Child Youth Serv Rev 2024;161:107650.

Ugwu LE, Ramadie KJ, Ajele WK, Idemudia ES. Childhood adversity and peer influence in adolescent bullying perpetration. Sci Rep 2024;14(1):30959.

ปาณิสรา ปานมุนี, พัชรินทร์ นินทจันทร์, โสภณ แสงอ่อน. ปัจจัยที่สัมพันธ์กับพฤติกรรมการรังแกกันในวัยรุ่นด้อยโอกาส. วารสารการพยาบาลจิตเวชและสุขภาพจิต 2568;39(1): 21–43.

ปัญจรัตน์ ไล้สุวรรณชาติ, ธานินทร์ สุธีประเสริฐ, สุภาพร บุญศิริลักษณ์. ปัจจัยทำนายการกลั่นแกล้งและถูกกลั่นแกล้งทางไซเบอร์ของนักเรียนในภาคกลางของประเทศไทย. วารสารสุขภาพจิตแห่งประเทศไทย 2565;30(2):100–13.

Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1986.

Shetgiri R, Lin H, Avila R, Flores G. How parents can end bullying: risk and protective factors for child bullying in the United States. Acad Pediatr 2010; 10(4):246–52.

Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1965.

Wongpakaran T, Wongpakaran N. Confirmatory factor analysis of Rosenberg self-esteem scale: a study of Thai student sample. J Psychiatr Assoc Thailand 2011;56:59-70.

Olweus D. The revised Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Bergen: Research Centre for Health Promotion, University of Bergen; 1996.

Velásquez AM, Santo JB, Saldarriaga LM, López LS, Bukowski WM. Context-dependent victimization and aggression: differences between all-girl and mixed-sex schools. Merrill-Palmer Q 2010;56(3):283–302.

Man X, Liu J, Xue Z. Effects of bullying forms on adolescent mental health and protective factors: a global cross-regional research based on 65 countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19(4):2374.

Published

2026-04-19

How to Cite

หาญพัฒนชัยกูร ก. ., จิรัฐิเกรียงไกร ช., & เกษรสุวรรณ์ จ. . (2026). Factors Influencing Bullying Perpetration among Lower Secondary School Students in Pathum Thani Province. Journal of Health Science of Thailand, 35(2), 224–233. Retrieved from https://thaidj.org/index.php/JHS/article/view/17286

Issue

Section

Original Article (นิพนธ์ต้นฉบับ)

Most read articles by the same author(s)