Policy Recommendations on Extending Access to Renal Replacement Therapy under Universal Coverage in Thailand - ทางเลือกเชิงนโยบายสำหรับขยายการเข้าถึงบริการทดแทนไตภายใต้ระบบหลักประกันสุขภาพถ้วนหน้า

Authors

  • Phusit Prakongsai International Health Policy Program – Thailand
  • Viroj Tangcharoensathien International Health Policy Program – Thailand
  • Vijj Kasemsup Community Medicine Center, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital
  • Yot Teerawattananon International Health Policy Program – Thailand
  • Thanom Supaporn สมาคมโรคไตแห่งประเทศไทย
  • Chitpranee Vasavid International Health Policy Program – Thailand

Keywords:

health policy, efficiency, equity in access to health care, renal replacement therapy, Universal Coverage, health insurance, rationing

Abstract

            The aim of this study was to explore policy options for the extension of access to renal replacement therapy (RRT) under universal coverage in Thailand. Policy options proposed mainly relied on two objectives: efficiency in utilizing government health resources and equity in access to health services. Human right and ethical principles were also integrated into these policy options.

Several research methods including literature reviews, secondary data analysis, in-depth interviews with stakeholders, and the analysis of policy options based on the WHO manual on ethical dimensions of health resource allocation were employed. Researchers from IHPP-Thailand, Harvard University, University of Bergen, and the WHO jointly explored this issue during May - June 2005.

             Results revealed that neither hemodialysis nor peritoneal dialysis was cost-effectiveness due to its expensive cost per life year saved. However, protecting households against financial catastrophe justified public funding for RRT and to be financially feasible, rationing was unavoidable. Among four alternatives emerging through the extensive literature review and a series of stakeholders' consultation, the study advocated end-stage renal disease (ESRD) prevention and the provision of RRT to every patient, up to an age cut-off, or to every patient with a fix number of RRT years by providing more years to the younger patients. These two options were financially feasible and achieve ethical principles of providing equal chance to all patients, while the other two alternatives which provide life-time medical services to all or selected some would become relatively less possible.

              Regardless of which policy options that the government will take, a substantial improvement of many crucial issues including primary and secondary prevention of end-stage renal disease, adequate and sustainable health care financing, an efficient RRT service system, an establishment of central purchasing and bargaining system on peritoneal dialysis (PD) solution and erythropoietin injection, a mandatory report of Thailand registry of renal replacement therapy (TRT registry), incentives for PD, and an effective kidney transplantation system is needed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-09-13

How to Cite

ประคองสาย ภ., ตั้งเจริญเสถียร ว., เกษมทรัพย์ ว., ตีระวัฒนานนท์ ย., สุภาพร ถ., & วาศวิท จ. (2021). Policy Recommendations on Extending Access to Renal Replacement Therapy under Universal Coverage in Thailand - ทางเลือกเชิงนโยบายสำหรับขยายการเข้าถึงบริการทดแทนไตภายใต้ระบบหลักประกันสุขภาพถ้วนหน้า. Journal of Health Science of Thailand, 15(4), 617–31. Retrieved from https://thaidj.org/index.php/JHS/article/view/10232

Issue

Section

Original Article (นิพนธ์ต้นฉบับ)

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2