Evalution of nationeide hospital BP intervention

Authors

  • Krisada Hanbunjerd Division of NCDs, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health
  • Nuttiwan Punmung Nuttiwan Punmung B.N.S

Keywords:

severe hypertension, diagnosis inertia, premature death, undiagnosed hypertensive patient

Abstract

Hypertension is a common disease, with an estimated 1.3 billion people aged 30-79 worldwide suffering from it, two-thirds of whom live in low- and middle-income countries. According to the 6th National Health Examination Survey of the Thai population aged 15 years and older, the prevalence of hypertension is as high as 25.2% of the population. It is a major cause of serious complications such as ischemic heart disease and stroke, which are leading causes of premature death in Thailand. Additionally, the survey revealed that 48.8% of hypertension patients had not been previously diagnosed. Early detection of undiagnosed hypertension, particularly in patients with severe hypertension who are at high risk, and ensuring they receive timely treatment can prevent dangerous complications and reduce premature mortality. Nationwide Hospital BP project, which aims to identify patients with severe hypertension among outpatients in hospitals across the country and ensure they receive a diagnosis and continuous care, is a significant initiative. Its objectives are to accelerate the diagnosis of hypertension, reduce the number of undiagnosed patients, and lower premature deaths due to complications in individuals unaware of their condition. This research sought to evaluate the project’s implementation over a three-year period, from 2022 to 2024, by assessing changes in the average percentage of hypertension diagnoses among patients with severe hypertension, using data from the HDC database. The differences in averages across the three fiscal years were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA, while factors related to the project’s success and challenges were examined through survey data. The average percentage of hypertension diagnosed in the second year (25.79%) and the third year (25.44%) was significantly different, at a 95% confidence level, compared to the first year (20.44%). However, no significant difference was found between the second and third years. Based on these findings, it is recommended to develop additional supportive measures informed by qualitative data. These include: enhancing supportive factors, developing alert systems for hypertension detection, securing administrative support, broadly communicating hypertension management guidelines, addressing barrier by tackling delayed diagnoses by organizing meetings to review guidelines within medical organizations, systems improvement for verifying diagnoses and scheduling follow-up appointments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mills KT, Stefanescu A, He J. The global epidemiologyof hypertension. Nat Rev Nephrol 2020;16(4):223–37.

Gil-Extremera B. Hypertension as the Major Cause ofStroke. Journal of Clinical Trials in Cardiology2015;2(2):13.

Flatow JS, Byfield R, Singer J, Chang MJ, Schwartz JE,Shimbo D, et al. Clinical Inertia in the diagnosis andmanagement of hypertension following ambulatory bloodpressure monitoring. Am J Hypertens 2025;38(5):280–7.

Ekpalakorn V. The 6th Thai national health examinationsurvey 2019-2020. 6th ed [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2025Apr 15]. Available from: https://kb.hsri.or.th/dspace/handle/11228/5425

Aekplakorn W, Chariyalertsak S, Kessomboon P, AssanangkornchaiS, Taneepanichskul S, Goldstein A, etal. Trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment,and control in the Thai population, 2004 to 2020.BMC Public Health 2024;24(1).

Martinez R, Soliz P, Campbell NRC, Lackland DT,Whelton PK, Ordunez P. Association between populationhypertension control and ischemic heart disease and strokemortality in 36 countries of the Americas, 1990-2019:an ecological study. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2022;46:e92.

Krist AH, Davidson KW, Mangione CM, Cabana M,Caughey AB, Davis EM, et al. Screening for hypertensionin adults: us preventive services task force reaffirmationrecommendation statement. JAMA 2021;325(16):1650–6.

หทัยชนก เกตุจุนา, ณัฐิวรรณ พันธ์มุง ,เบญจมาศ นาคราช,ขวัญชนก ธีส ระ, สุภาพร ศุภษร. การพัฒนาแนวทางการจัดการเมื่อพบผู้รับบริการมีความดันโลหิตสูงู ในโรงพยาบาล.วารสารสิ่งแวดล้อมศึกษาการแพทย์และสุขภาพ 2567;9(2):220-30.

กระทรวงสาธารณสุุข. ระบบคลังข้อมูลด้านการแพทย์และสุขุ ภาพ $$อินเทอร์เน็ต$$. 2567 [สืบค้นเมื่อ 15 เม.ย. 2568].แหล่งข้อมูล: https://hdc.moph.go.th/center/public/standard-report-detail/291f57594cc6c0fdd5514a59c20c8904

Soma R, Praekunatham H, Thitichai P. Evaluation of ahospital-based hypertension screening program in sevenhospitals in Thailand. Outbreak, Surveillance, Investigation& Response (OSIR) Journal 2023;16(3):153–60.

Kessler CS, Joudeh Y. Evaluation and treatment of severeasymptomatic hypertension. am fam physician [Internet].2010 [cited 2025 Apr 15];81(3):348-50. Availablefrom: https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2010/0201/p348.html

Borzecki AM, Kader B, Berlowitz DR. The epidemiologyand management of severe hypertension. J HumHypertens 2010;24(1):9-18.

Webster J, Newnham D, Petrie JC, Lovell HG. Influenceof arm position on measurement of blood pressure. BrMed J (Clin Res Ed) 1984;288(6430):1574-5.

Nyvad J, Reinhard M, Christensen KL. A case of anextreme white coat effect. Blood Press 2020;29(1):63–7.

Schmieder RE. End organ damage in hypertension. DtschArztebl Int 2010;107(49):866-73.

Published

2025-10-28

How to Cite

หาญบรรเจิด ก., & พันธ์มุง ณ. . (2025). Evalution of nationeide hospital BP intervention. Journal of Health Science of Thailand, 34(5), 868–883. Retrieved from https://thaidj.org/index.php/JHS/article/view/16624

Issue

Section

Original Article (นิพนธ์ต้นฉบับ)