Enhancing Health Literacy Through a Community Participation Model for Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes in Uthai Thani Province

Authors

  • Taweep Samakkarnthai Uthai Thani Provincial Public Health Office
  • Amnat Kayadee Nong Bom Kluai Sub-district Health Promoting Hospital

Keywords:

Community Participation Model, Glycemic Control, BUDDY Model, Health Literacy

Abstract

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus is a critical public health issue both globally and nationally. Diabetes affects multiple dimensions including physical, psychological, social, and economic well-being, particularly among patients with uncontrolled blood glucose levels. This research and development study aimed to develop a community participation model to enhance Health Literacy for improving glycemic control among uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus patients in Uthai Thani Province. The Frameworks integrated three concepts. Health Literacy, Social Support, and the Health Belief Model. The research was conducted in three phases from August 2024 to February 2025. Phase 1 assessed the situation and needs of 385 patients and 12 health network stakeholders. Phase 2 developed and tested the BUDDY Model in two sub-district health promoting hospitals, each for 12 weeks, involving 30 patients and 30 Village Health Volunteers (VHVs) per site. Phase 3 evaluated outcomes and extracted lessons learned.

Findings from Phase 1 indicated Health Literacy among patients was at moderate levels (65.6%), with the highest scores in knowledge/understanding (69.0%) and the lowest in self-management (60.4%), highlighting a gap between knowledge and practice. In Phase 2 The development of the BUDDY Model, which is the result of using the Appreciation Influence Control (AIC) process, has 5 components: Building Knowledge & Skills, Understanding Patient Needs, Driving Behavioral Change, Decision Making Support, and Your Health Empowerment. The intervention significantly improved Health Literacy, attitudes, and self-care behaviors (Z = -2.85 to -3.31, p < 0.05), notably increasing physical activity by 39.3%, though HbA1C reduction was minimal at 0.4% (p > 0.05), possibly due to the short intervention duration for biochemical changes. Both the pilot and expansion areas showed similar results, with mean differences not exceeding 5%. Phase 3 revealed high satisfaction and participation rates (84.0–90.0%), with strengths in home visits and resistance band use, but limitations in elderly patients' digital literacy skills with LINE application and the short intervention period.

Recommendations include enhancing digital skills among the elderly and establishing sustained VHV support systems. Additionally, the BUDDY Model should be integrated into primary healthcare systems, cost-effectiveness analyses should be conducted compared to complication treatments, personal and environmental factors influencing success should be studied, and the model should be expanded to other non-communicable diseases to ensure long-term sustainability.

References

กอบกุล มาดีคาน, นงนุช โอบะ และ ปิ่นหทัย ศุภเมธาพร. (2562). ปัจจัยที่มีผลต่อความรอบรู้สุขภาพของผู้ป่วยเบาหวานชนิดที่ 2. วารสารพยาบาลศาสตร์, 37(2), 45–56.

ขวัญเมือง แก้วดำเกิง. (2561). ความรอบรู้สุขภาพ เข้าถึง เข้าใจ และการนำไปใช้. กรุงเทพฯ: บริษัท อมรินทร์พริ้นติ้ง แอนด์ พับลิชชิ่ง จำกัด (มหาชน).

วิชัย เอกพลากร, หทัยชนก พรรคเจริญ และ วราภรณ์ เสถียรนพเก้า. (2564). รายงานผลการสำรวจสุขภาพประชาชนไทยโดยการตรวจร่างกาย ครั้งที่ 6 พ.ศ. 2562-2563. นนทบุรี: กระทรวงสาธารณสุข.

อังศินันท์ อินทรกำแหง. (2560). ความรอบรู้สุขภาพ การวัดและการพัฒนา. กรุงเทพฯ: บริษัท สุขุมวิทการพิมพ์ จำกัด.

American Diabetes Association. (2021). 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of medical care in diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care, 44(Suppl 1), S15–S33. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc21-S002

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020). Health literacy. Retrieved February 22, 2025, from https://www.cdc.gov/healthliteracy/index.html

Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O'Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Free, C., Phillips, G., Watson, L., Galli, L., Felix, L., Edwards, P., Patel, V., & Haines, A. (2013). The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine, 10(1), e1001363. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001363

House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

International Diabetes Federation. (2019). IDF diabetes atlas (9th ed.). Brussels: International Diabetes Federation.

Lee, C., Coughlin, J. F., & Lee, J. (2016). Older adults’ adoption of health-related technology: A systematic review. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 71(4), 704–718. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv089

Liu, L., Hou, X., Xue, L., Mao, L., & Li, Y. (2019). Social support and hospital readmission in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2019, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7632450

Lorig, K. R., Sobel, D. S., Ritter, P. L., Laurent, D., & Hobbs, M. (2001). Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Effective Clinical Practice, 4(6), 256–262.

Moher, D., Hopewell, S., Schulz, K. F., Montori, V., Gøtzsche, P. C., Devereaux, P. J., Elbourne, D., Egger, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010). CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 340, c869. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c869

Nutbeam, D. (2000). Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International, 15(3), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/15.3.259

Powers, M. A., Bardsley, J., Cypress, M., Duker, P., Funnell, M. M., Fischl, A. H., Maryniuk, M., Siminerio, L., & Vivian, E. (2017). Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: A joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Diabetes Care, 40(7), 1009–1019. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-1721

Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). Historical origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Education Monographs, 2(4), 328–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200403

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being in health contexts. American Psychologist, 75(2), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000601

Schillinger, D., Grumbach, K., Piette, J., Wang, F., Osmond, D., Daher, C., Palacios, J., Sullivan, G. D., & Bindman, A. B. (2002). Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA, 288(4), 475–482. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.4.475

Sørensen, K., Van den Broucke, S., Fullam, J., Doyle, G., Pelikan, J., Slonska, Z., & Brand, H. (2012). Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health, 12, 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-80

Stolar, M. W. (2010). Glycemic control and complications in type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The American Journal of Medicine, 123(3 Suppl), S3–S11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.12.004

Stratton, I. M., Adler, A. I., Neil, H. A. W., Matthews, D. R., Manley, S. E., Cull, C. A., Hadden, D., Turner, R. C., & Holman, R. R. (2000). Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 35 prospective observational study. BMJ, 321(7258), 405–412. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405

Strom, J. L., & Egede, L. E. (2012). The impact of social support on outcomes in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. Current Diabetes Reports, 12(6), 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-012-0317-0

Toci, E., Burazeri, G., Kamberi, H., Jerliu, N., Sørensen, K., & Brand, H. (2014). Health literacy in a population-based sample of adult men and women in Albania. European Journal of Public Health, 24(Suppl 2), 136–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku163.016

World Health Organization. (1998). Health promotion glossary. Geneva: WHO.

Published

2025-04-10

How to Cite

สมัครการไถ ท., & ค้ายาดี อ. (2025). Enhancing Health Literacy Through a Community Participation Model for Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes in Uthai Thani Province. Primary Health Care Journal (Northern Edition), 35(1), 86–101. Retrieved from https://thaidj.org/index.php/NRTC/article/view/16369

Issue

Section

Original Article (นิพนธ์ต้นฉบับ)