Comparison study of success of Laryngeal Mask Airway insertion between Inflated cuff and Deflated cuff techniques in non paralyzed anesthetized Patients Chaiyaphum Hospital

Authors

  • Chutima Kangkarn Anesthetic Nurse Chiyaphum Hospital

Keywords:

general anesthesia, Laryngeal mask airway, result of success, inflated cuff and Deflated cuff techniques

Abstract

A Quasi-experimental research study compared result of the success of laryngeal mask airway insertion between inflated cuff and and deflated cuff techniques in non paralyzed anesthetized patients Chaiyaphum hospital.  60 non paralyzed anesthetized patients from 15 December 2015-30 April 2016 were random. The research instruments were 1).laryngeal mask airway 2). The devices were regard to number and duration of insert attempt, sore throat and airway trauma were assessed by content validity devices. Data analyzed using descriptive statistic (l.c., percent, mean and standard deviation) and inferential statistic was independent t-test, chi square, Fisher’s extract test.

The result found that: Data of group 1 was similar to group 2,the  success of insertion in male 96.3% , age 66-71 years 36.7 %, average weight 59-60 kg, average height 166-168 cm, ASA class 2 66.7% malampati class 1 76.6%. result of success insert laryngeal mask airway between inflated cuff and deflated cuff techniques no statistical significance.

Conclusion: Inflated cuff and deflated cuff laryngeal mask airway insertion are acceptable.

According to the success, a further study relating to other factors that affect the success of laryngeal mask airway insertion technique should be conducted to understand root causes and be able to find more inclusive solutions. The examples of cases that should be studied include cleft lip, cleft palate patients with overlapped teeth issue as their oral cavities are narrowed and not suitable for laryngeal mask airway insertion which will cause various complications.

References

อริศรา เอี่ยมอรุณ. Airway management. [12 พฤศจิกายน 2558]. Available from: http://www.si.mahidol.ac.th/anesth/undergrad/Airway %20management%20อ.อริศรา%20.pdf

Bartz, A.E. Basic statistical concepts. (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1999.

อรรัตน์ กาญจนวนิชกุล, และคณะ. การศึกษาเปรียบเทียบผลสำเร็จการใส่อุปกรณ์ช่วยหายใจ ชนิดปิดครอบกล่องเสียงแบบ I gel®กับ Laryngeal mask airway Unique ในผู้ป่วยที่ได้รับการระงับความรู้สึกโดยไม่ได้ใช้ยาหย่อนกล้ามเนื้อ. วารสารสงขลานครินทร์เวชสาร, 2558;33(1):53-61.

Chen MK, Hsu HT, Lu IC, Shih CK, Shen YC, Tseng KY, et all. Techniques for the insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: comparison of the Foley airway stylet tool with the introducer tool in a prospective, randomized study. BMC Anesthesiology, 2014;14:105.

HG Wakeling, PJ Butler, and PJ Baxter. The Laryngeal mask airway: A comparison between insertion techniques. Anesth Analg, 1997;85(3):687-90.

Published

2019-07-30 — Updated on 2021-08-31

Versions

Issue

Section

Original Article