Soft Power Strategies for PM2.5 Risk Communication in Border Regionsommunication in Border Regions
Keywords:
PM2.5, risk communication, community engagement, border regions, digital media, cultural adaptationAbstract
Particulate matter 2.5 mm. (PM2.5) pollution poses significant environmental and public health challenges in Thailand’s border regions, where local and transboundary sources exacerbate air quality problems. This study investigated the integration of soft power principles into PM2.5 risk communication strategies through a mixed-methods approach conducted across six border provinces. The research involved 353 participants, including public health officers, village health volunteers, and community members, examining knowledge levels, communication practices, and cultural adaptation needs. Quantitative analysis revealed high levels of technical knowledge among health workers (93.8% correctly identifying PM2.5 characteristics), though confidence in communication skills varied significantly, particularly in managing public misconceptions (Mean=3.60, SD=0.736). Strong correlations emerged between community cooperation and managing public doubts (r=0.785, p<0.01), underscoring trust-building’s importance. Qualitative findings elucidated that these doubts often stemmed from economic constraints, feelings of helplessness regarding transboundary pollution, and inconsistent regulatory enforcement. Qualitative findings also emphasized the crucial role of cultural sensitivity and economic considerations in message reception and behavioral change. The study identified significant gaps between technical understanding and effective community engagement. Digital media presented both an opportunity (high demand for training, Mean=3.97, SD=0.794) and challenges, with implementation barriers in resource-limited settings. Qualitative data highlighted the need for locally tailored digital content and culturally appropriate solutions to overcome these barriers. The research contributes to theoretical understanding by demonstrating specific applications of soft power in environmental health communication and identifying mechanisms through which cultural factors influence message effectiveness. These findings support the development of culturally adapted communication strategies that integrate traditional and modern approaches while maintaining strong community involvement. Recommendations include strengthening cultural competency training for health workers, developing integrated communication strategies, and enhancing cross-border cooperation mechanisms. Future research directions should examine long-term impacts of culturally adapted communication strategies and investigate emerging technologies in supporting cultural adaptation of health messages.
Downloads
References
Shi Y, Zhao A, Matsunaga T, Yamaguchi Y, Zang S, Li Z, et al. Underlying causes of PM2.5-induced premature mortality and potential health benefits of air pollution control in South and Southeast Asia from 1999 to 2014. Environment International. 2018;121:814-23.
Janta R, Sekiguchi K, Yamaguchi R, Sopajaree K, Pongpiachan S, Chetiyanukornkul T. Ambient PM2.5, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and biomass burning tracer in Mae Sot District, western Thailand. Atmospheric Pollution Research. 2020;11(1):27-39.
Wills I. Community Participation in Pollution Control. Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform. 2001;8 (3):209-22.
Jainontee K, Pongkiatkul P, Wang Y-L, Weng RJF, Lu Y-T, Wang T-S, et al. Strategy Design of PM2.5 Controlling for Northern Thailand. Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 2023;23(6):220432.
Calderón JL, Beltran RA. Culture and linguistics: neglected variables in the health communication equation. Am J Med Qual. 2005;20(4):179-81.
Amnuaylojaroen T, Parasin N. Perspective on Particulate matter: from biomass burning to the health crisis in mainland Southeast Asia. Toxics 2023; 11(7):553.
Cheong KH, Ngiam NJ, Morgan GG, Pek PP, Tan BY, Lai JW, et al. Acute health impacts of the Southeast Asian transboundary haze problem-a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(18):3286.
Nye JS. Soft power : the means to success in world politics. 1st ed. New York: Public Affairs; 2004.
Covello PVT. Risk communication and message mapping: A new tool for communicating effectively in public health emergencies and disasters. Journal of Emergency Management. 2006;4(3):25-40.
Inlaung K, Chotamonsak C, Macatangay R, Surapipith V. Assessment of Transboundary PM2.5 from biomass burning in Northern Thailand using the WRF-Chem Model. Toxics. 2024;12(7):462.
O'Hair HD. Risk and health communication in an evolving media environment. Oxfordshire: Routledge; 2018.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3:77-101.
Cairns G, de Andrade M, MacDonald L. Reputation, relationships, risk communication, and the role of trust in the prevention and control of communicable disease: a review. J Health Commun. 2013;18(12):1550-65.
Brooks LA, Manias E, Bloomer MJ. Culturally sensitive communication in healthcare: A concept analysis. Collegian. 2019;26(3):383-91.
Watanabe N, Kaneko A, Yamar S, Taleo G, Tanihata T, Lum JK, et al. A prescription for sustaining community engagement in malaria elimination on Aneityum Island, Vanuatu: an application of Health Empowerment Theory. Malaria Journal. 2015;14(1):291.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ministry of Public Health

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

